necessary solution to any human tragedy. As humans consider the suggested goals of human cloning (to create spare body parts, produce a child, or advance science), in each case there are other alternatives or techniques to look at for the achievement of these goals. Just because human cloning may be available some may take it out of hand and misuse it extensively, which can ultimately corrupt the society and lead to destruction. By using a practical kind of risk/benefit ratio, it is easy to see that the risks of humans cloning, both moral and biological, out-weigh the benefits of individuals and society as a whole. If the genetic diversity is in danger and the family is threatened, then these risks are ultimately too great to take. Science should be in service of the noblest goals for humanity. "The cloning of human embryos for research will open the door to additional (and to some of us, far greater) moral hazards. Humans suffering from horrible diseases never comes to an end, and, like-wise, our willingness to use embryonic life in the cause of research, once permitted, is also unlikely to find any natural stopping point" (The Moral Case 10). Some people might just not know their limitations in human cloning, such as to what extent they should actually use it and never end. Technology is sometimes used to simply achieve the end of a desired product of procedure. But it is important to recognize that both means and end are significantly connected to morals as well because with them together, they affect individuals and the created universe.
             The desire to clone another person is predicted upon another perspective that does not let men and women fulfill their biological progeny purposes and it rather views them as instruments. The replication of genes, is simply a sum, lacking uniqueness and the qualities which are part of being made in God's image. The word replication alone is negating toward an underst...