One cannot simply define the meaning of truth because it is so ambiguous. The word "truth" differs greatly from a word like "apple" that has an immediate visual connotation, and is easily and unequivocally defined. "Truth" however, is an intangible and equivocal concept with inanimate and ineffable traits. So in order for one to define truth, one must first incontrovertibly accept that truth is not limited to one simple definition. Due to it's ambiguity, truth has a versatility to it that can be applied in various scenarios rendering it's meanings to be relative to it's context. Truth is a concept comprised of two fundamental facets; the universal truth, and the individual truth. Now that truth has been categorized into it's two contexts, I can define truth as, "the one and only current possibility or view that is logically,morally or empirically uncontested with absolute certainty." It must be noted though that the concept of absolute truth does not exist and cannot exist without objectivity. I will establish that objectivity is a theory (illusion) but not a reality and as a result it is subjectivity that fuels what we consider to be true.
             In order to further analyze truth, the two contexts ,unto which truth can be applied, must be defined. Universal truth is a view that is logically,morally or empirically uncontested with absolute certainty and is accepted by the world. While individual truth is a view that is logically,morally or empirically uncontested with absolute certainty, but only by one person. For example, I see the apple as being green but the rest of the world sees it as red. There is no reason to say that my definition of the apple is any less true than the definition according to the rest of the world. There is no way in either views to prove that the other wrong because in essence, perspectively, it is true that the apple is both green and red. We can h
             ...