entually grow into a baby. Where as in research on human embryos often result in the destruction of the embryo. Where as cloning for the purpose of making a human being, creates a life and lets it live.
             I found some arguments against cloning, which I agree with totally.
             1. Clones will be grown to produce "spare parts" for other people, or to be used for medical research. Thus, clones -- who will be, of course, human beings -- will be treated as disposable property, with fewer rights than any slave, bred and killed for the benefit of others.
             2. By making a copy of a person, cloning robs people of their individuality.
             3. By creating a person through an artificial process, cloning is "playing God", trying to replace the process created by God with one of our own invention.
             4. Some number of babies -- embryos, if you prefer -- created by cloning will die because of technical problems in the process, and more will be killed deliberately because they are imperfect. Thus, cloning will inevitably result in the death of innocent babies.
             (http://www.pregnantpause.org/ethics/whyclone.htm, by Jay Johansen)
             Those above arguments state some of the differences between cloning and research on a human embryo. In the research aspect, the scientists are gaining information
             ...