impartially. Berkeley makes no note of this whatsoever except to include all the senses at some point or another in this short rebuttal by Philonous. The absence of acknowledgment of those with a hindrance to the senses is part of what keeps Berkeley going. Exactly what a reader/perceiver are perceiving is of no consequence; after all, when perceivers are stripped of all opinion they are able to arrive at the same conclusion: there is sight. There is touch and taste. This almost tricky tool of persuasive theory lures a reader/perceiver into thinking deeper and more intuitively about themselves. Once this is established other issues can be addressed. Most important is the repetition of these sensory words. If a teacher says something in class, a student will be more apt to remember it if it is repeated ten times versus only one time. After a concept or word is learned it is then that the teacher is able to use other devices to demonstrate to the student the mechanics behind a particular thought, concept or object. Berkeley is using this tool of echo to allow those perceiving the pas
             ...