The government should have the right to place people on "no fly lists" if they should disagree with their airport policies. Doing this would help indicate the possibility of any dangerous people on board, ensure safety for passengers, and policies are made to help maintain a healthy environment so they should not be broken. In order to provide a more reliable airport, the government should be able to put any person who violates their policies on the "no fly list."
             If not for these policies, we might have dangerous people on an airplane. Especially since the hijacking on September 11th, the increase in security makes it possible to identify if there are any threats around. We don't want to have any terrorists or hijackers on an airplane filled with innocent people and lastly, we definitely do not want history to repeat itself. Therefore, placing people who do not follow government policies on "no fly lists" is a suitable way to prevent any future attacks or threats.
             With all the policies enforced, passengers will feel safer on their trip. It is important for the passengers to be comfortable and feel secure while on their flight. Every airport wants their customers to be 100% satisfied with their services. Otherwise, there may be a decline in airplane tickets purchased at that certain airport. Because of September 11th, people have become more cautious when it comes to boarding airplanes. They have no problem with the baggage checking and identifications because it makes them feel comfortable and relaxed.
             The Bill of Rights states we have the right to our privacy. Some feel that the excessive searches are an invasion of privacy. Like John Gilmore, of the Bay Area, they feel it is highly unnecessary, and IDs are supposed to be optional. However, times have changed since. The acts of September 11th have changed a lot of things and the way we look at life. As always, policies are rul...