taming of the shrew analysis

apos;". (Induction.2.6.) When he finally decides to accept this new role, his behavior proves to be inconsistent with that of aristocracy. He will not try sack, preferring the ale that is familiar to him, and reveals his poor taste upon the introduction to his supposed wife and his unrefined commentary on the play. Shakespeare implies that a character can perform any role, but one's identity cannot be manipulated. Shakespeare attacks the image of power designated by the culturally constructed hierarchy. He questions the extent to which the hierarchy can be manipulated, and conveys the idea of power as reality or fantasy. Power lies beyond the hierarchy and assumes numerous roles, as do many integral characters in Taming of the Shrew.
             Shakespeare introduces each character as a distinct personality. As the play unfolds, the reader is given subtle indications that the roles performed by these characters contrast their identities. Bianca is portrayed as a mild, submissive, obedient, and consequently desirable woman. She acts as a literary foil to Kate, who is depicted as an intolerable and violent shrew in constant opposition to everything around her. Luciento remarks, "But in the other's silence, do I see maid's mild behavior and sobriety" (I.1.71), further developing the sisters as opposing characters. Petruchio is illustrated as a violent, witty, cynical man seeking to marry strictly for money. The characters are actors, and it is through their performance that they triumph. Each freely changes and chooses their roles in order to manipulate the patriarchy and gender biases in society, and
             ...

More Essays:

APA     MLA     Chicago
taming of the shrew analysis. (2000, January 01). In MegaEssays.com. Retrieved 09:52, October 02, 2026, from https://www.megaessays.com/viewpaper/32327.html