As stated and defined by the book, propaganda is an expression of opinion or action by individuals or groups deliberately designed to influence opinions or actions of other individuals or groups with reference to predetermined ends. Judging from this definition, we can all presume and believe that propaganda differs greatly from scientific analysis, hence also a propagandist will vary significantly from a scientist. For the most part to be referred to directly and candidly, topics will be separated and concluded as facts and influenced opinions. People can most definitely form a wide range of debates and explanations as to how these two groups of individuals hold opposing views on numerous questionable issues.
             Without a doubt, propaganda exists in all societies of our world with such unlimited diversity. At many times, it is of natural intuition for people to feel and deem what they believe in shall be of the best and utmost dominant opinions. Such people may consider that their opinions to be the most beneficial to others surrounding them in their environment. Such people are known to be propagandists. Propagandists tend to hold strong beliefs in certain issues and topics and, in conjunction, they like to make it well known to the world. Such propagandists like to present the option for other individuals or groups of people to join their group as to believe in their supposed best judgment. It is mainly tactics and strategies of persuasion in which propagandists like to exercise for people to form opinions in regards to certain subjects and matters. Indisputably, opinions can sometimes be as strong as rocks, holding faith in much unbelievable things; however, I feel that opinions, after all, are only personal self thoughts in which should be forced upon others.
             On the other hand, scientific analysis holds the honor where it contains evidence and verification in support of their final results and announced facts. Scienti...