Capital Punishment has been part of the criminal justice
system since the earliest of times. The Babylonian Hammurabi Code(ca.
1700 B.C.) decreed death for crimes as minor as the fraudulent sale of
beer(Flanders 3). Egyptians could be put to death for disclosing the
location of sacred burial sites(Flanders 3). However, in recent times
opponents have shown the death penalty to be racist, barbaric, and in
violation with the United States Constitution as "...cruel and unusual
punishment." In this country,although laws governing the application
of the death penalty have undergone many changes since biblical
times, the punishment endures, and controversy has never been greater.
A prisoner's death wish cannot grant a right not otherwise
possessed. Abolitionists maintain that the state has no right to kill
anyone. The right to reject life imprisonment and choose death should
be respected, but it changes nothing for those who oppose the death at
The death penalty is irrational- a fact that should carry
considerable weight with rationalists. As Albert Camus pointed out, "
Capital punishment....has always been a religious punishment and is
reconcilable with humanism." In other words, society has long since
left behind the archaic and barbous "customs" from the cruel "eye for
an eye" anti-human caves of religion- another factor that should
raise immediate misgivings for freethinkers.
State killings are morally bankrupt. Why do governments kill
people to show other people that killing people is wrong? Humanity
becomes associated with murderers when it replicate their deeds. Would
society allow rape as the penalty for rape or the burning of
arsonists' homes as the penalty for arson?
The state should never have the power to murder its subjects.
To give the state this power eliminates the individual's most
effective shield against ...