"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a
             free state, the right State, the right of the people to keep and bear
             Arms, shall not be infringed," said by fathers of the Bill of Rights.
             The 2nd Amendment was wrote into the Constitution of United
             The original intent and purpose of the 2nd Amendment was to
             preserve and guarantee, not grant the pre-existing right of
             individuals, to keep and bear arms. Although the amendment
             emphasize the need to form a militia, membership in a militia is
             As the constitution gives us the right to have and use a gun they my also take the right too. In my opinion people should be able to if they are at their full mind. A child should not have guns but should be able to learn about what they could do and how they are to be used. I think guns don't cause violence but the people that use them do, however, some don't agree.
             In many court cases people have been declared the right to bear arms. In some courts however they have come in conflict with this law. The Miller vs. Us (1939) was one. In this case there was the arrest of a man for possession of an unlicensed, sawed-off, large shotgun. The defense was that it violated their 2nd Amendment rights. Do you think this is true? The court ruled that it wasn't. The case took place when men of all kinds carried guns for their protection and to kill their food, and a symbol of their manhood.
             As I think about the 2nd Amendment, many people can interrupt it in many different ways. In some cases the court has been for the most part, in agreement with people bearing arms, but some judges and juries aren't. In recent years this is a very hot topic and has a lot of jargon for and against the bill. I could see some of both sides with my eight-yea
             ...