In cases of Juvenile arrest, rehabilitation, not punishment should be streesed
Essay written by Ryan King
Why would our government try to hurt kids? Well, kids are being hurt right now.
You see, in America punishment, rather than rehabilitation is being emphasized for
juveniles who commit crimes. This way of thinking must stop with the addition of
rehabilitation and prevention programs for juvenile offenders.
States vary in their legal definition of a juvenile. In Illinois, for example, a
juvenile is defined as any person below the age of 17. Using each states legal definition,
the FBI reported that 62% of juveniles arrested in 1992 were referred to juvenile courts,
5% to a criminal or adult court, 2% to a welfare agency, and 1% to another police
agency. The kids sent to adult prisons were eight times as likely to commit suicide. It has
also been evident that those kids incarcerated with adults are also more likely to become
repeat offenders.
Legislation pending in congress now is debating several issues. Among them are
weather to have children as young as 13 be prosecuted and sentenced as adults for certain
crimes, give prosecutors the discretion to transfer a juvenile to an adult court in certain
crimes, and allow juveniles to have incidental contact and in some cases be housed with
adults.
I take an opposing point of view with that of congress. If a 13 year old is
imprisoned, how can he become a functional member of society upon his release? How
will he create a positive lifestyle for himself? The real question is: How can he turn in
any direction other than that of crime? He simple will not be able to. If a child is sent to a
prison to stay in a cell for hours at a time, the only life he will know is the life he came
from, not the life that could be his. Also, a prosecutor shouldn't have the privilege to
decide what court a kid is placed in. A prosecutor has a built in bias; the decision shou...