is the
unsatisfactory ability of a constitution to remedy the problems
of nationalism and ethnic differences. Preuss notes that when
the constitutional state gained favor in North America,
it was founded on the principle of the unitary state; it was not
designed to address the lack of national identity which is found
throughout Europe - and which is counter to the concept of the
constitutional state (48). "Measured in terms of socioeconomic
modernization," writes Helga A. Welsh, "Central and Eastern
European countries had reached a level that was considered
conducive to the emergence of pluralistic policies" (19). It
seemed that the sole reason the downfall of communism, as it
were, took so long was the veto power of the Soviet Union.
According to theories of modernization, the higher the levels of
socioeconomic achievement, the greater the pressure for open
competition and, ultimately, democracy. As such, the nations in
Eastern and Central Europe were seen as "anomalies in
socioeconomically highly-developed countries where particularly
intellectual power resources have become widespread" (Welsh 19).
Due to their longtime adherence to communist policies, these
nations faced great difficulty in making the transition to a
pluralist system as well as a market economy. According to
Preuss, these problems were threefold: The genuine economic
devastations wrought by the communist regimes, the transformation
of the social and economic classes of the command economy into
the social and economic lasses of a capitalist economy and,
finally, the creation of a constitutional structure for
political entities that lack the undisputed integrity of a nation
With such problems as these to contend with in re-
engineering their entire economic and political systems,
...