Lie Detectors Tell Lies : The Unreliability of Polygraphs Used in Criminal Trials and
Polygraphs, commonly known as lie detector tests, are in question to whether or not they
are realiable enough to use in court cases. The common test used in criminal investigations is the
Control Question Test (CQT) . The CQT works by comparing physiological disturbances that
occur when questions are asked which are relative to the crime in question. Vague control
questions are asked to allow an innocent person to show more physiological disturbances to the
vague questions than to the questions which are directly relevant to the crime at hand. If the
person in question shows more disturbances when asked the relevant questions, it is a good
indication of deception (Honts 309). Even though courts and criminal investigators do permit
other unreliable evidence such as eyewitness testimonies, the polygraph is not reliable enough to
be allowed as evidence in the delicate process and evidence in criminal investigations.
Polygraphs can too easily be defeated by simple countermeasures to be accepted as
reliable and allowed in criminal investigations. Charles Honts , David Raskin, and John Kircher
from the Department of Psychology at the University of Utah state the following in their article
"Mental and Physical Countermeasures Reduce the Accuracy of Polygraph Tests":
Research has shown that training in simple physical maneuvers, such as biting the
tongue or pressing the toes to the floor, can be effective in defeating polygraph
tests by enhancing physiological reactions to control questions. Honts, Hodes, and
Raskin reported that 60% of their decisions were incorrect when subjects had
been trained to unobtrusively bite their tongues and press their toes to the floor
when control questions were presented during the test. Using similar training and
stronger incentives to pass the test, Honts, Ra...