is that scientists
             are just making propaganda in order to make the public to get on their side.
             Another reason is what could happened if cloning is ban. What about consequences of
             banning a technology- death, disease, disability, indignity, on happiness, and blighted life's
             that would result from imposing limits on cloning discoveries and advances (3.Bailey,Pg66).
             What might possibly happen if cloning is ban, scientist's as well as experts believe that
             efforts to ban cloning could drastically stop the creation of new medicines that would help
             millions of people. What I believe is that cloning might be a discovery for scientists
             to duplicate human life's. However, I certainly don't' believe that this discovery would go
             further than that. Simply for the cost and waste of time.
             Furthermore, Clinton took two swift steps: he called for moratorium on the use of
             federal funds for human cloning research and he asked his national biothetics advisory
             commission to let him know within 90 days whether the new technology should be even
             more tightly controlled. (4.Gorman,Pg66). In my opinion, I state that, no matter who pays
             for it or for what reason is done, should be made a criminal offense in the U.S. The
             president doesn't have no right to spend federal funds in a research that most likely would
             be denied by congress, plus is just a waste of time and money.
             In addition, can poor people afford cloning. More likely, the cost of genetic
             treatments will drop substantially, and poor people in the future will be much richer than
             poor people today are, so they will easily take advantages of the new medical treatment.
             ...