Death Penalty

;Despicable crimes should be dealt with realistically" (Badeu et al. 131). I have no mercy for the killers, and nobody should have any mercy for anybody who does harm to another human being. Who gives a right to anyone to commit crime anyway? Michael Kronenwetter says, "The death penalty has always been considered especially appropriate for the crime of murder" (Kronenwetter 6). Murder is the biggest crime and biggest offense, and it should be treated like that.
             Over the years, public safety has become a meaningless thing, not worth defending anymore, and the death penalty has been persecuted for just that reason. Every country in the world is ready and willing to kill thousands, even millions of human beings in brutal, merciless way to defend their nation from the aggression of other countries. I don't see why public safety doesn't deserve as much respect and protection as a nation's national security does. In fact, it can be argued that supporting armies and war is far more barbarous than the death penalty is. The whole reason why nations and government exist is to defend their citizens from vicious criminals. When it fails to do that, they become of little use to its citizens. I think that the people in all the
             ...

More Essays:

APA     MLA     Chicago
Death Penalty. (2000, January 01). In MegaEssays.com. Retrieved 13:16, October 10, 2026, from https://www.megaessays.com/viewpaper/52492.html