A revolution is a major change in the existence of life. This war being
             a revolution is something that I do not agree with. I think that a revolution is
             some change that is a change that effects the whole world or changes the
             whole world. An example would be when the dinosaurs went out. That is a
             major change and it did effect the whole world. Or when the sun dies out,
             the existence of life would change and people all around the world would
             have to change the way they live their lives.
             The Revolutionary War was not such a major change throughout the
             world. Yes, it was a very big change for the new Americans and England,
             but it didn't effect the world as much as a few of the other catastrophes
             would. One of the best reasons I have to support my reasoning is what the
             Americans wanted. They wanted their colonies to be about the same as
             England was. They only wanted to make minor changes not major. But
             England probably realized this and wanted to make America worse than them
             so they taxed them on a lot of things. England tried to change America and
             they did do it but the end result was not enough. These changes to me, are
             definitely not enough to be a revolution.
             If a revolution was base on a smaller criteria this could have been a
             revolution. Or if a revolution was based on time I could easily say it would
             be The Progressive Theory. But, I would base a revolution upon such things
             as: did the world change, were people all over the world effected, and did it
             change the existence of life. I totally give my vote to The Non-Revolutionary
             Theory, and I would stand by my choice 100%.
             ...