ong the provisions legislated by the Canadian government
was a "Firearms Acquisition Certificate" for the purchase of any
firearm, and strengthened the "registration requirements for handguns
The purpose of the 1977 leglislation was to reduce the
availability of firearms, on the assumption that there is a "positive
relationship between availability and use". In Robert J. Mundt's
study, when compared with the United States, trends in Canada over the
past ten years in various types of violent crime, suicide, and
accidental death show no dramatic results, "and few suggestions of
perceptible effects of the 1977 Canadian gun control legislation". The
only positive effect , Mundt, found in the study was the decrease in
the use of firearms in robbery with comparion to trends in the United
States . Informed law enforcement officers in Canada, as in the United
States, view the "impact of restricting the availability of firearms
is more likely to impact on those violent incidents that would not
have happened had a weapon been at hand"(152).
In an article by Gary A. Mauser of the Simon Fraser University
in British Columbia, he places special emphasis on the attitudes towards
firearms displayed by both Canadians and Americans. According to Mauser,
large majorities of the general public in both countries "support gun
control legislation while simultaneously believing that they have the
right to own firearms" (Mauser 1990:573). Despite the similarities,
there are apparent differences between the general publics in the two
countries. As Mauser states that "Canadians are more deferent to
authority and do not support the use of handguns in self defence to
As Mauser points out that "it has been argued that cultural
differences account for why Canada has stricter gun control
legislation than the United States"(575). Surprisingly enough,
nationwide surveys i...