This paper is both my report and review of sociologist Jack Katz's book, 
            
 Seductions of Crime.  I am quite fascinated with the ideas of criminology, so I found this 
            
 book's ideas and stories interesting.  Katz uses much logic in trying to explain things that I 
            
 can relate to, but in many instances it seems to come across to me as if he were trying to 
            
 make excuses for the criminals he depicts.  In all of his accounts, the stories were based on 
            
 	The best way to try to prove a thesis is to use many different ways of 
            
 experimentation and gathering data.  Katz used a wide variety of sources to conclude to 
            
 his theories.  He got a grasp on the entire situation of every single criminal incident before 
            
 he analyzed them.  His information on shoplifting, burglary, and vandalism came from a 
            
 group of university students he did  a study on for three years.  Most of the information he 
            
 used for robberies came from a study done in Chicago by Franklin Zimring and James 
            
 Zuehl.  The rest of his data, which includes most of the book, was taken from graduate 
            
 students who did their research in Eastern and Southern Los Angeles. 
            
 	Katz calls his  first chapter "Righteous Slaughter".  He believes most homicides are 
            
 self righteous acts defending communal values and lack premeditation. In terms of solving 
            
 crimes, homicides are usually the easiest to solve.  Marvin Wolfgang's Philadelphia study 
            
 supports this:  "Two-thirds of the offenders in criminal homicide who were taken into 
            
 custody by the police were arrested on the same day they committed the crime."  In most 
            
 cases all participants knew other before the murder and most of the victim's actions were 
            
 aggressive.  Katz explains that he believes because of this the victims partially cause the 
            
 murder.  In some more violent cases I would back him up, but I think that in most simple 
            
 cases where it is only a matter of m...