uis to
Mrs. Emerson. This was when Scott argued that under the terms of
the Missouri Compromise, the fact that he and Dr. Emerson lived
in Illinois and Minnesota made him a free man. The Missouri
Compromise did not allow slavery in whatever territory that
remained from the Louisiana Purchase north of a specific line,
36o 30' of north latitude.(Hopkins 32-34)
At this time the issue of slavery was a major concern.
The Mexican War provided the United States with a lot of new
territory,and the question of the future of slavery in the
territories was on everyones mind. The people of the North who
were against slavery wanted Congress to prohibit slavery in the
John C. Calhoun, the spokesman for the South, said that
Congress did not have the right to prohibit slavery in the
territories. The Southern attempt to extend the line of the
Missouri Compromise failed, so their only hope was Calhoun's
constitutional criticism of Congress' attempt to prohibit slavery
in the territories. This was why they plunged themselves
completely behind Calhoun's ideas. Calhoun argued that the
territories were "the common property of the states of this
Union. They are called the' territories of the United States,'
and what are the ' United States' but the States united? Sir,
these territories are the property of the States united; held
jointly for their common use." This statement beautifully
illustrates how extreme the Southern view of state sovereignty
was. It was the Southern belief that the states should have the
right to declare slavery in their states and it is beyond
congressional power to prohibit slavery."(Kutler 36-38)
Southerners believed that their very existence depended on
an equal amount of slave and free states. They realized that if
Congress prohibited slavery in the territories there would be no
more equality of slave states and free states.
The Northern view was based ...