ct of the Fourth Amendment protection". (1967, Katz v. United States) Some employers say that they could assign humans to monitor the workstation but using a video camera with out a microphone, is basically the same of what the human eye could observe. Organizations like the Sheraton hotel justify using their use of hidden surveillance cameras in emp!
             loyee change rooms based on a claim that they "suspect drug use". (Mann, 1995) Some other employers argue that it is just another way to stop theft and to prevent drug use, and it is part of a speed up. Employers also frequently state that they simply see video surveillance as an effective means of improving security and in some instances, serving specific functions such as improving quality control and maintaining compliance with regulations.
             On the other hand monitoring and surveillance can give employees the feeling that they are not to be trusted and thus foster a defensive mentality, which is destructive to both workers and employers. (International Labor
             ...