The article is about the foreign affairs of Bush and Gore. It expalins how Gore
could ask the republicians about how Bush shouldn't be the worlds cop or 911. Says
that Gore could ask Bush if the republicians are so serious about foreign affairs then
why do they let both the senate and the house affair committees be run by
lawmakers. It also asks Gore what Clinton successes of foreign affairs were. It talks
about what would each candidate do if a dangerous situation came up what U.S.
costly intervention they would have. Says if one plane is shot down in Iraq then what
would they president do with Saddam Hussein. Tells how U.S. should spend more
money investing in foreign aid so that U.S. doesn't have to be the cheapskate around
here. The article says that if Saddam takes a few more barrels off of the market we
will soon have to pay 3 dolars a gallon for gas.
I think that this article is a bunch of @#$#. I think this because both Bush and
Gore look into foreign affairs enough so that its not to excess. This article wants
U.S. to be totally on to all of foreign affairs. Our country doesn't have to deal with
other peoples problems right now. We do enough for foreign countrys. Yes we do
need to make some agreements but not to excess as i have said before. Anexample
of what agreements we should make is the situation about the gas. We are buying it
for to much money at the moment from Saddam. I don't think we need to put more
money into finacial aid. We put plenty of money in there already. If we did put more
money in finacil aid that would mean we would have to pay more taxes. It says we are
Saddam hostages. I don't see it that way I see it that in a way we are help by Saddam
and his gas, but i think that soon he will start to chang it to the way it was. I think
Saddam is testing on what we will do when a tiny crisis like this, caused by S
...