Why are the coalition forces still in Iraq? What was their purpose for being sent to Iraq? Should they leave or should they stay? Do they help rebuild the country? All of these are questions which should be thought about deeply.
             When President George W. Bush Jr. declared war and sent these coalition forces to Iraq, he said it was to search for weapons of mass destruction. So far, no weapons have been found. If this was the forces objective, then what's the purpose for their presence now? They are not gaining anything by staying there. Instead, they are losing more and more soldiers. By remaining in Iraq, I feel they are only asking for more trouble.
             I personally feel that Iraq is definitely not a place in which the coalition forces need to be, they need to depart. The U.S. military should have been removed from Iraq when the war was officially declared over. Now that the war is over, all our soldiers are dropping like flies and many are being injured.
             It is time to get the U.S. soldiers out of Iraq, seeing as though they have not found any weapons of mass destruction. President Bush needs to remove our troops from Iraq, send them home and start organizing a plan to repair and rebuild Iraq. This plan should state that the U.S. will help restore the destroyed country of Iraq. By seeing this plan through, it is my prayer that peace is achieved between these two countries.
             Therefore, it is in my greatest interest that the coalition forces be removed from Iraq, since they have not discovered any weapons of mass destruction. I feel President Bush needs to organize a plan of restoration, implement it, and order the soldiers to return to the U.S. Nothing significant is being accomplished in their stay, so why not pull them out before anymore blood is shed and any other lives are lost.
             ...