There has always been controversy when East would meet West,
particularly in the art realm.Hirayama says, in reference to
Japan, that by increasing ones exposure to Western art, one calls
into question many long held artistic assumptions and
institutional practices (57). He noted that such caused upheaval
throughout the Meiji period, an era of cultural uncertainty (57).
Some artists, during the controversial years in the early part of
the twentieth century, would vie for more Western styles. While
some artists did try to make their works acceptable world wide by
choosing this option, the Japanese did effectively create unique
art forms anyway. Japanese aesthetics provide a key to
understanding artistic works that are quite different than those
Within the East Asian artistic tradition, China had been the
leader and Japan's art took much from the country; Yet, Japanese
artists developed their own style, which is clearly not Chinese
(Griffin PG). And of course, the world was not always
discriminatory against the East. Many centuries ago, before the
eruption of the very popular western art movements, there was a
different attitude. In order to get a glimpse of how different art was prior to
the present day, a look at the Asuka period may prove to be
somewhat enlightening. The periodization terminology was first
created around the year 1900 to reference the architectural and
art period called Asuka ("Scope" PG). Sekino had once designated
the period as being the time most strongly influenced by Korean
art (PG). In fact, it had been noted that many Korean artists
came to Japan around this time (Gardner 635). Further, Okakura
considered the Asuka Period to extend quite broadly from the
introduction of Buddhism at approximately 552 to the transfer of
the capital to Heijo (Nara) in 710 ("Scope" PG). Thus, according
to this definition, the period ran not much longer than 150
years.The...