What is a terrorist? Well the denotation of this word is as follows, somebody who uses violence or the threat of violence, especially bombing, and assassination, to intimidate, often for there own purpose. By this definition, government personals are not excluded from being a "terrorist" or participating in "terrorism". Actually many government's activities are equivalent to those more world renown ones in according to the direct dictionary definition of "terrorism". This is because media more often than not is on the government's side, so they don't criticize their government because it is this government that bails them out in hard times such as September 11th. To strike back for the tragedy that took place on September 11th governments have come together to join and create a coalition and call there mission "The fight against terrorism" to answer to the actions carried out on September 11th. This title makes very little sense? Due to fact that the method these "anti terrorist" groups are using are identical to those that are used by people classified as a "terrorist". Sidney Sheldon wrote in his book Sands of time, the only difference between the terrorist and the government is that, one is in power and the other one is not. So what can the USA ultimately expect to accomplish via the air strikes targeting Afghanistan? Since two wrongs don't make a right, United States of America can ultimately expect to accomplish nothing via air strikes targeting Afghanistan, as September 11th did nothing but create more hatred among people. The three areas that will get provoked is the menace of more terrorism, food issues, and the continuing growth of concern for children.
             This war, as it is being fought to the nail, will not make a better, safer place. It will make it far more dangerous. Indeed, one can argue about the justification of indiscriminate and excessive...