You are presented with the choice of driving either a 1988 Chevrolet Suburban, or a 1992 Geo Metro. Without evening blinking your eyes you choose the Suburban. You know that it is the ideal vehicle. Now, some will wonder as to why the Suburban is the wisest choice.
             First of all, the Suburban looms over the Metro. The thirty-one inch tires make the metro's sixteen-inch tires seem practically insignificant. The Suburban is almost twice the length of its competitor and close to being twice as high. The size gives advantages everywhere. When driving down the road everyone stays out of its way because it would crush most other vehicles like a tin can. If it did get involved in some kind of accident, the driver would more than likely be fine. The reason for this is that the Suburban is built like a rock. It is very solid and reliable. When the Metro drives down the road, it's like a coffin on wheels. No one moves out of its way because it has no size to it. If it hit anything, it would simply crush and become useless. The driver in this case would probably be seriously injured or killed. Size means a lot on the road, especially nowadays.
             The most beautiful thing about the Suburban is that it is not really that attractive at all. Rust corrodes the body and the paint is faded and chipping in many places. The four headlights in the front grille give it that mean, tough look that every Suburban should possess. The front bumper is bent and scratched, the chrome peeling away. All these things make it even better. The Geo has the problem of being too rounded. The hatchback in the rear curves down to the weak, plastic bumper. The hood does the same thing in the front, but with less curve. Its headlights are recessed into the grill, which gives it the look of something weak and powerless. The paint is also faded, but not chipping as badly as the Suburban. The Geo's biggest problem is that it doesn't have enough bare, raw m...