ates should go headlong and give Bosnia their full support, and commit more troops and more supplies to the Bosnian Cause.
             There are some positive things done by the United States in Bosnia. The presence of U.S troops did bring temporary peace to the area. Although the peace is purely an act, it does give leaders time to talk and plan without worrying about their people dying. Also, the United States presence in Bosnia helped to eradicate the most horrific problem in Bosnia, large Serbian concentration camps and mass Albanian genocide. United States troops were deployed to tear down old concentration camps and free the inhabitants of current ones. The troops also uncovered mass burial sites where the Serbian Government, under Slovadon Malosavitch, ordered the killing of thousands of ethnic Albanians. The discovery of these sites is a key element in the conviction of Slovado Malosovitch on war crimes charges taking place presently. Had the U.S properly occupied the region, providing aide while allowing educated economic analyst to run the economy, it is possible they could have restored the economy.
             Although there are good things being done, The United States affairs in Bosnian are impairing their foreign policy, and the bad things heavily outweigh the goods. The United States is torn with whom to side in this dispute. If the United States side with the Serbian government, then the Croats and Muslims become their enemies. On the other hand if they side with the Muslim and Croat extremist then, a very powerful, very influential Serbian government looks on them in abhorrence. If they pull out all together, the on looking nations of the U.N might view the action as weak and lacking commitment. Either way, there is no clean "out" for the United States in this situation.
             "Rather than making clear to our allies
             ...