There are many different people who have commented and critiqued Robert Frost's work. Some of them are as long as ten pages and others are just short paragraphs, but all of the ones that I've read have pretty much the same thing to say.
             Tina Ferris commented on Frost's simple vocabulary. She said that he had a keen observation of rural New England life. Ferris says how Frost has a "down-home folkish wisdom".
             Another anonymous person said things that were very similar to Tina Ferris's commentary. He says how Frost's work is principally assosiated with the life and landscape of New England. Like Tina Ferris, he comments on how Frost's traditional verse forms. He goes on to say that Frost is far from a minor poet. He says how frost's poems often have dark meditations on universal themes. He finally concludes that Frost's work is full of irony and layers of ambiguity.
             The final review I read was out of a reader's encyclopedia. It commented on how Frost often seems opposed to the main tendensies of modern poetry. He is more of a clear, simple, moral poet who writes of rural, democratic joys. It says how he is both the positive poet of rural America, and the "chronicler of the dark night of human soul". It comments on how he is a sophisticated poet who uses a lot of irony and ambiguity. Though Robert Frost used traditional verse forms, the created tension within of thought and feeling.
             ...