To some it's considered an economic system in which the means of production and distribution are privately or corporately owned and development is proportionate to the accumulation and reinvestment of profits gained in a free market. To others it's a system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which the people equally share all goods. So, is it simply a social system based on the principle of individual rights, or is it a theoretical economic system characterized by the collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for the common advantage of all members.
             People in favor of doing away with inequalities in the possession of property, as by distributing all wealth equally to all, or by holding all wealth in common for the equal use and advantage of all are known as anti-capitalists. Those characterized by private or corporate ownership, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market are considered capitalists.
             Anti-capitalists: can count on less violence and corruption due to the fact their government standards distributing more or less equal wealth to all of its citizens.
             Capitalists: are free to control and regulate their personal economy.
             Anti-capitalists: lead a more organized life where there is no rich, or poor.
             Capitalists: property is all privately owned.
             Anti-capitalists: decide and follow through with decisions that are forced upon them conjured from a government or group.
             Capitalists: have more obligations to make decisions on their own despite difficulty and may face more economic hardships.
             Anti-capitalists: lead a safer life because they can't m
             ...