Many years ago convicted murders would face the risk of getting the death penalty. Many people now want capital punishment to be brought back. Capital Punishment cannot be reinstated due to the fact that it is cruel and unusual treatment. This paper will clearly demonstrate that capital punishment cannot be brought back because it is unconstitutional. This essay will show how it costs less to imprison someone then to execute them. Finally, this will show how imprisonment is a worse sentence then execution.
             Capital punishment cannot be reinstated because it would violate the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms sections 7 and 12. Section 7 of the CCRF states that "Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice." Section 7 guarantees us life, liberty and personal security of all Canadians. It also demands that governments respect the basic values of justice whenever it intrudes on those rights. This section is useful in criminal cases because an accused person faces the risk that, if convicted, their freedom will be lost. Section 12 of the CCRF states that "Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment of punishment." The death penalty is an unusual treatment because it only applied to capital murder and not to other offences in the Criminal Code. For example, the Supreme Court of Canada held that a law creating a minimum sentence of seven years' imprisonment for the crime of importing narcotics into Canada, regardless of how much is involved, is cruel and unusual punishment.
             The death penalty should not be brought back also because it would cost less to imprison someone then to execute them. A 1993 study conducted by Duke University showed the death penalty in North Carolina costs $2.16 million per execution more than
             ...