Gun control. Should it be more controlled? Is it controlled at all? How do you control such a thing? This, to me, is a very controversial subject with two very different, but both understandable stand points.
             On one hand you have pros, the people for guns. In such a violent stricken society, as today, proper protection is necessary in almost all situations. Guns can have their good sides. Even though there are other means of safety, you never know what you are protecting yourself from. Sometimes you have to fight fire with fire.
             The other points of view are the cons, which are against guns. They say that guns should not be in the possession of any person at anytime. The wrong people, such as raged adults (or teenagers these days), are using guns for deadly assassination or injury. Even small children are getting a hold of guns and pulling the trigger at ages as young as four or five, killing themselves or others around them. It is also a large risk of having a gun in your home for any reason. The outcome of gunplay is never good or amusing, but yet injurious, many times fatal and very sorrowful all the time.
             Both sides could debate for hours. My views and concerns are for pros, as long as people use them for protection purposes and not to mess up human nature, and also out of reach of small children, there should not be a problem. Guns can be used for the right reasons and people should know the right reasons and act upon them decently. As for the questions asked earlier, I do not think that guns are being controlled and I think that they should be controlled in a more fashionable manner. They should only be issued to people under certain and required circumstances. Guns should not be allowed to criminals nor should they be allowed to anyone with a history that is not approved of by the state. The use of guns for safety would not be needed if such people did not get a hold of them!
             ...