the global balance of organisms. Nevertheless, scientists defend themselves by showing several benefits of Biogenetics Engineering, such as the possibility of finding cures for diseases or solving the scarcity problem of organs used in transplants, and also creating an end for world famine.
             As we can see, there are great opportunities and great risks regarding the area of Biotechnologies and Genetics. While using some of this knowledge with animals and plants to benefit mankind, there is a great risk if this knowledge is wrongfully used. For example, at the same time as Biogenetics brings mankind uncountable advantages, there is a threat that these benefits can later on turn into hazardous outcomes, like bio technological weapons. After all these speculations, we are left with some questions like, do we begin to manipulate all human genes? What limit is danger enough? What concerns should the scientists be aware of? Most importantly, who is going to control all these experiments? This is such a novelty for science that unfortunately, it has too many questions for only a few, and not always precise, answers.
             Another question that definitely has to be answered is whether there is an ethical difference between the ability to correct an abnormal organism and preventing one from occurring, even though the experiments' outcome may cause serious and unrecoverable damage. The real question behind this entire situation actually is quite simple, it is how many errors each specific experiment must have before it can be successful or even how many lives we are going to have to jeopardize to achieve the final and definite result. For me, it has always been clear that the evolution of any kind of technology has always, in some kind of way, endangered the environment or even humans. It is just a matter of looking through out our history; for example, before the cure of diabetes was found, many patients had to experiment with new drugs, ...