Controversy and music have always gone hand-in-hand. Lyrics, dance moves, and clothing, or lack of it are always in the spotlight, which generates much debate. Some call it art, others call it bad taste. As with all creative expressions, the beauty is all in the eyes and ears of the beholder. If we censor the media, disallowing certain music to be played, we will be taking away an art form that exposes what the world is really like, as well as violating one of the most important principles our country was founded on- freedom of speech.
             The first amendment guarantees rights to free speech. Everyone is protected and has their right to freedom of expression. It is obvious, that by disallowing music artists to rap about certain issues, we are blocking their freedom of speech. How can this be declared a constitutional action? Censorship defies our government and violates our rights. However, history has always produced controversy over whether to censor or not.
             Music has always been the voice of rebellion. In the late 50s and early 60s, efforts were made to censor R&B music. Concerned members of society felt that this music promoted wild living, promiscuous sex and lewd dancing. During the late 60s and 70s, Jim Morrison's dark and suggestive lyrics stirred up communities, and parents were appalled to see Elvis Presley's hip-thrusting. Today, our generation has the on-stage antics of Marilyn Manson and the continuous controversy surrounding Eminem, causing individuals and groups to speak out against the music. Many people who would like to censor creative expression are simply afraid of the issues certain lyrics explore.
             However, music mirrors the society that creates it. Should we be concerned about our society? Absolutely. Violent and sexual lyrics are indeed something to be concerned about, but perhaps critics should look beyond the music and see where the problem really lies. Music is a tool, a tool used to show what is reall...