Euthanasia is a very strong topic discussed today. It is a rising issue and the morals that support it need to be justified. Euthanasia can be defined in many ways. It is most referred to as doctor assisted suicide and mercy killing. Euthanasia really is the practice of painlessly putting to death persons who have incurable, painful, or distressing diseases or handicaps. It derives from the Greek words meaning good or peaceful death. There are many controversies involved with the issue of euthanasia, involving the sanctity of life and the right to die positions. Today it can be right or wrong depending on the individuals and their beliefs. Meanwhile, it can be justified that both positions are morally acceptable.
             Before explaining the two different points that are the most controversial issues involving Euthanasia, it is important to understand the context of the issue and what kinds of Euthanasia there are. The situation involved and the reasons for the need of euthanasia must be clearly explained and comprehended. Currently 85% of Americans die in some kind of healthcare facility. 70% of those choose to with hold some kind of life-sustaining treatment. Each of us will either have to face that same decision about ourselves, or indirectly will be involved in that decision as family members and loved ones face death. Medical knowledge alone does not tell us when to let go, and medical practice is often committed to fighting on and on no matter what the odds are. Euthanasia's goal is how we die not whether we die. A good life can be the best preparation for a good death. It is specifically used for the purpose of having a relatively painless death free from pain and the intrusion of medical attempt to sustain life.
             The two forms of Euthanasia are called active and passive euthanasia. Active is performed through active means such as lethal injection, which is used in order to bring about someone's death. ...