Hunting Vs. PeTA

             People for the ethical treatment of animals is one thing the organization is that and more. PeTA is considered a very dangerous group that will go to any lengths to protect animals, even risk their lives.
             The firt thing they have done wrong here, is that they are putting animals on a human level, animals do not have thoughts/ feelings, they can not communicate, and therefore are not nearly as important as humans are. When you put animals up higher like on human level it makes it morally the same to kill a child as a puppy, is that morally right? Corrupt is the right word. Of course no one wants to intentionally harm animals but it does not mean you have to give up everything that includes them!!! PeTA is against pets, they are against eating meat and drinking milk, now let me ask, how does drinking milk cause any harm at all to a cow? It does not. They claim milk to be bad for your health, when drunk occasionally it is not bad at all for adults and for children it is necessary to have calcium because they are growing. A vegan diet is not enough for a child. Sure you can fill them up with supplements but think about all the preservatives...they cause cancer you know.
             Hunting however, kills the animal quick and painless, it is humane, it's food, it's warmth, and its necessary.
             Hunting is far better then chaining yourself to a tree, c'mon.
             ...

More Essays:

APA     MLA     Chicago
Hunting Vs. PeTA. (2000, January 01). In MegaEssays.com. Retrieved 22:18, October 17, 2026, from https://www.megaessays.com/viewpaper/87012.html