ut doctors who perform euthanasia; she believe that these doctors are murderers. Yes, it is the doctor who pulls the plug on then life support systems, but it was not a choice made by him. The doctor might offer his advice on the situation, but it is the family who decides when to perform euthanasia. Euthanasia is a last resort. Doctors perform every measure, and leave no stone unturned before they turn to euthanasia. For example, a person with brain damage can remain alive for years with the help of life support, even though that person doesn't even hold a remote chance of regaining consciousness. Why should this person remain on life support when all that is doing is causing more pain for the family? To call a doctor who administers euthanasia to a patient with no chance of recovery or revival in a life and death situation is asinine and absurd.
             Later in the argument, Dyck makes a bold statement when she says that ulterior motives for the legalization of euthanasia are to "eliminate old, weak, and useless" people in the world and to mini
             ...