The main theme in this paper is Development of the Humanities and Cultural Roots. The humanities occurred in Italy 500 years ago according to this paper. The humanities centered on the literature of antiquity. It is said that man was the measure of all things. I think this means that man was more important than anything else alive. They who wrote this paper made it seem to me that man was more important than anything else that had ever moved.
             Man is not the superior Bieng and shouldn=t be written as one. Humanists criticized the mediaeval education. AHumans remained creatures, mortal and imperfect.@ That line explains the humanists finest maker. God, they believe that he made men/women were made imperfect for a reason. They had to be made like that because if they were perfect evolution couldn=t take place. If there were no mistakes made than nothing could improve. Humanist conveyed the scriptures that was made by their Christian. Humanists believed that some humans were more human than others. It makes no sense what so ever to think that way. Men with wealth and support gained leisure. People studying the humanities acquired more humanity than others. Humanist in the nineteenth century tried to save the human spirt from industrial growth. Humanists today now study Greek and Roman literature; which in my opinion is smart sense Plato and Aristotle were for humanities.
             Everyone feels that they belong in a group. Colere means to cultivate, this is the Latin root word for culture as a verb. As a noun is cultural, this means soil cultivation. Language grows by metaphors, says the paper, I agree with this because talking helps language get more complex. The human mind is like a field, it must be tiled. This is a great thesis since to get a human smarter you must educate them just like planting seeds in a field to make the tomatoes grow. We have the right to cultivate the brain how ever we want, we should live that right to the
             ...