Social Darwinism

lacious argument. Ward used his book to display his opinion, supported with factual evidence that all humans have minds that allow them to make decisions rational and otherwise, therefore effecting the course of evolution. "Rather than viewing humankind as helpless pawns of the evolutionary process, Ward believed that individuals and government could shape the future through eradication of poverty and education of the masses." (Gale Research). After thoroughly studying Sumner's work, Ward wrote a book, in which, the last third was entirely devoted to disproving Sumner's work. In one instance, Sumner had called genius hereditary. Ward challenged this assertion stating that all children have access to different schooling, as those in the wealthier communities have access to better schooling, those in the poorer communities have access to worse, or no schooling (Hofstadter, 168). The final blow delivered by Ward was his election as president to the American Sociological Society, in 1906 (Hofstadter, 156).
             Although there were people such as Ward trying to shed light on the unscientific injustices some were displaying, many still took to heart what was said about Social Darwinism as if it was a race war yet to be won by the white man. "God has... been preparing the English-speaking and Teutonic people for a thousand years... He has made us master organizers of the world.", was what Albert B. Everidge, a Senator of Indiana, thought about the mat
             ...

More Essays:

APA     MLA     Chicago
Social Darwinism. (2000, January 01). In MegaEssays.com. Retrieved 08:38, September 10, 2026, from https://www.megaessays.com/viewpaper/94875.html