nt" (Gordon, 129) and that is just the beginning. The author goes on for about a page and a half giving the great accomplishments of just one female. While at the same time bringing down the male counterparts, such as Fredrick Blossom, who was recruited to do fund raising for Sanger, and had a dispute with her leaving her with the accounts of the Review, which is another one of Sanger's accomplishments. The story then loses its focus on Sanger and goes on to the doctors who opposed or helped Sanger and their opinions about the situation. The missing part is all the other people who were on the same side as Sanger and their accomplishments.
             Linda Gordon (despite the fact that this is a short story) made this section more meaningful for the reader by including all the other people who saw eye to eye with Sanger and wanted to help out, either by opening their own clinics or by helping in other ways. What the story does mention is that a man had to be hired in order to do the fund raising and in order to speak to the crowds, who was paid by "Sanger's wealthy second husband paid a $10,000 yearly salary...to tour the country speaking to medical groups for the ABCL." (Gordon 132) This does point out that there were other male supporters of this cause and women were not in this alone. At this point in history, women were not taken as seriously as men. Sanger needed male supporters to speak out for her so the crowd would listen without any bias thinking.
             Of course and those who knew that Sanger was behind it knew her to have a "radical reputation" (Gordon 133), which in fact with "the opposition of the Catholic Church lead the State Board to refuse a license" (Gordon 133) to supply and practice in contracepti
             ...