twenty first century. The mainstay in
policy has always been to promote and instill democracy. However, in
foreign nation, the U.S. must be able to first establish a viable economic
system within the desired nations. We should not expect or want a nation
total authoritarian government to a market economy; doing so would be a
former Soviet Union is a notable example of this philosophy. Instead,
willing to allow developing to nations invest in U.S. markets before we
return, a viable export import system will be established. But it is
economy of the developing nation be monitored and run by its own
United States should only be there for advising purposes. When a
finally been achieved, then--not right away--a more American, laissez -
economic network will be allowed to grow. If
The greatest challenge the United States faces is implementing a
is consistent throughout the Middle East. Islamic nations aren't likely
ideas such as human rights, and democracy. These nations will never be
western ideas when the United States continues to levy sanctions against
is lucky that it has an ally in Saudi Arabia and Israel, allowing them to
these foreign policy agendas against the other Middle Eastern countries,
face serious economic consequences in the oil and gas industry. Oddly
Saudi Arabia is probably as much against western ideologies as any nation
East. Women do not have equal rights, torture is frequent, there is no
church and state, and Saudi Arabia is extremely far from developing any
(Miller 58). Now, when the U.S. promotes democracy and human rights, why
support one country and condemn the next? Throughout the Cold War,
policy would give aid to any nation opposing communism. So during that
developed a "you're either with us or against us" type of policy. With
many of the Middle Eastern countries became so called enemies with the
led to unrest and hatred of western democ...