My beliefs on evolution are very agnostic; I don't know what exactly to believe. Some well-developed arguments lead me to think about six-day creationism, while others, such as Darwin, believe that we all evolved from tiny molecules billions of years ago. But, when thinking about the actual "answer" is, a question came to me: Why can't it be both?
             It seems to me that scientific evidence is very factual and also very infallible. Hence, it is hard for me to go against years and years of research and evidence that supports the idea of evolution. But scientific evidence doesn't answer all of the questions that I have. Questions like who created the very first molecules that later led to the birth of the human population? That is where I believe God comes into the picture. I think God set the process in motion by starting the first few elements in the right direction and letting them go, which eventually led to the world today.
             The idea of creationism seems a little too fallible for me to believe. In six days, all of a sudden, there were all of the things we see today, minus the technology. I find that very hard to believe. What about the dinosaurs? Are the fossils that scientists found just rocks that somehow formed the shapes of gigantic animals? I think not.
             So, my fundamental belief on the theory of evolution is that it is accurate and how we developed into the world this is today, but I do believe that God did have his hand in the mix. I think that he put together the bare essentials for life to blossom and let what was going to happen, happen. The main thing that aggravates me about discussing evolution and how the world came about is that there are no answers. Everything that is taken from what other people perceive as the correct answer and put into their own opinion, which is then pushed to the fullest by them and me onto others so they can feel safe with their view.
             ...