does not mean
these factors are unimportant, just that they would be insufficient in
themselves to sustain the relationship as a geopolitical reality). The
analysis that follows examines the development of the Anglo-American
relationship since the Second World War within the terms of this analysis;
it also seeks to argue that on balance the relationship has been beneficial
to both parties, with particular emphasis on the benefits it has brought
the United Kingdom. In summary, the argument here is that from the British
point of view America has been far more the friendly big brother' than the
The massive United States commitment of finance, materiel and human
effort to winning the Second World War dwarfed, in terms of simple
magnitude, Britain's war effort (although in relation to Britain's own size
and resources, of course, her own effort was total and all-consuming); this
fact alone indicated from the outset that the special relationship was
never going to be a partnership of equals. Churchill may have thought in
terms of the restoration of the Empire and a re-establishment of Great
Britain as a great power after the war, but the reality was, as the former
British Prime Minister A. J. Balfour commented in August 1945, that the
United States expected Britain to take her place as junior partner in an
orbit of power primarily under American aegis.'[4] The wealth and power of
the United States meant that Anglo-American relationship was intrinsically
always going to be characterized by a radical asymmetry of power'[5] and
that imbalance has characterized all interaction between the United States
and the United Kingdom from 1945 to 2004. This situation poses particular
problems for British political leaders, who need to fulfil their
commitments to their American allies reliably and effectively without
seeming to be simply a poodle' for US interests. In those cases where the
...