s;peace process'. The first being 'peace as the absence of conflict'. The second is referred to as 'the outcome of the peace process'. Since the start of the troubles in 1969 the IRA has been singled out the main cause of the conflict. Barnes, a British Labour Party MP, condemns the use of violence by appealing to the 'decent citizens to resist the violence carried out by the terrorists'. Politicians have effectively delegitimized paramilitaries actions through the embodiment of non-violence into the peace process, thus portraying the paramilitaries as "irrational, inflexible, and a threat to peace". Gillian's second term of peace highlights the means by which to attain that outcome, the 'process'. Sinn Fein's Tom Hartly employs the term by stating that:
             "Real peace needs to be built on the solid foundations of the democratic principles of justice and equality."
             Hartley attempts to legitimise the actions of paramilitaries as 'rational' and 'adaptable', with justifiable 'grievances'. Republican activists proclaim the use of violence as a result of oppression, not simply for violence's sake. Gillian, therefore proposes the embodiment of 'inclusion' into the discourse of peace, implementing the concept of 'give and take'. Adding the 'inclusion' variable to peace should help opposing sides to gain a greater understanding of each other's grievances.
             The British and Irish governments have continually placed the existence of the peace process to the end of 'paramilitary violence'. Organisations deemed to be carrying out violent acts have been excluded. Which is evident in the Joint Declaration for Peace:
             "Democratically mandated parties which establish a commitment to exclusive peaceful methods and which have shown that they abide by democratic process are free ...