no idea what her problem was either. This didn't make him bad right? Then isn't that the same as when Lennie didn't let go of Curly's wife's hair. Before any one person can accuse Lennie, especially in an age right now where actions by the mentally dificiant are understood to be like a childrens minds in actions, they must consider all views of the situation, not just the view of the vicum before claim someone good of evil.
             Moving over to George, the obviously wrong commiter claiming to be the victom. How could he even think of being a victom after trying to protect Lennie from getting what he deserved for creating all these crimes he obviously had one-hundred percent did on purpose! Yeah right ... George's simple intentions were to help not only a man despirately in need and in pain from the troubles of life. And most importantly he wished only to protect his friend. George's compations should be looked at as something this world needs more of. If George is so guilty then what of? Guilty of getting Lennie out of trouble that he didn't mean to cause? For instance, when he threw that mouse that Lennie had killed into the bushes to keep try to halp Lennie understand that he can't be petting mice no matter how soft they are because they can bite. George also got him out of towns because of different things that Lennie. George new that Lennie didn't know better, but George, out of the decency of human kind, took him under his wing. This all leading to what could make George shoot Lennie? What, it was fun for him? He wanted to? If that's the case then may this paper never be read by someone who thinks so cause that person might get to understand why George did it.
             George thought of Lennie as a son. The amount of compasion for Lennie was shown numberous times throughout the book. But the main one to focus on is the shooting of Lennie. George understood that Lennie killed Curley's Wife only because when she yelled for him to let go he ...