at fetus doesn't have access to it, then that fetus isn't any less viable that a fetus who does have access to it. As in the example provided by Zaitchik of "a women flying from Cambridge to Calcutta, and receiving the right to destroy a formerly viable fetus." Obviously, the distance traveled, or the poverty lived in, doesn't preclude a fetus from being viable at a certain point. The working definition prov!
             ided takes into account these observations, providing a clearer understanding for the criterion of viability, and thusly, enables Zaitchik to be better able to refute the objections made against this criterion.
             The body of Zaitchik's essay consists of several objections to viability, all using the objection from future medical technology as their basis. He discusses this objection to viability from only the liberals point of view throughout the essay. He does this for two reasons, one being to simplify his writing style, so as not to write, or the conservative, after every point, he makes. The other is that he expects the objection to b
             ...