differences in
reporting requirements between contracts over and under one million
dollars and companies over and under 100 employees. When
contracts and companies grow past a certain size, the reporting
requirements increase exponentially. Even Forest Gump would
recognize the importance of keeping all contracts under one million
dollars and all companies under 100 employees. "Smaller is better"
Some companies might have the potential to be very large and employ hundreds of
people. However, when companies realize what happens if they do become large
they decide not to expand their business to avoid implementing affirmative action.
Like a glass ceiling, companies know their potential but can not reach it.
Cost of affirmative action deters companies from becoming too large. The
larger they get the more money is spent the less profit is made. Why not stay
small and make the same profit? After all, the purpose of owning a business is to
make money. If the company stays small less work and money is involved with
enforcing affirmative action. If the company grows the more time and money goes
towards affirmative action. Starr (1996, p31) found:
The job itself is straightforward: the fabrication and installation of
a set of 15-foot-tall metal letters on the roof of a factory building. Doing
the work is child's play compared with following the contract. The
distinguishing features of the project are: a) the "progressive"
character of the customer, a large publisher, and b) my city
government's corporate welfare policy, which, by supporting the
project with tax abatements and other subsidies, subjects it to the same
equal-employment-opportunity requirements as a public project. Thus,
four levels of affirmative action: corporate, city, state, and federal.
The main part of the contract, printed in normal-siz...